12.17.22 | Bill Barr's FBI Hid Hunter's Laptop While Coordinating with Twitter Leadership

Another week goes by, and more damning evidence of unethical wrong-doing by the former Twitter leadership has been released by Elon Musk and company. But this weeks revelations also implicate our Federal Government, including former Attorney General of the Trump Administration; William Barr…

Screenshots of internal communications from former Twitter executives were shared with the public, building off the reporting of last week (See The Orbit’s newsletter dated 12.10.22). The latest additions expose the decision-making behind the banning of President Trump, the suppression of information that questioned or made allegations about the election, and the blatant disregard that many within Twitter had for it’s own Terms of Service.

The information released this week seems to primarily implicate one individual: Yoel Roth.

Yoel was the former Head of Trust and Safety at the platform but left after Elon Musk took over, stating he did not agree with the direction the company was taking. Upon his departure, the release of the Twitter Files has proven to be especially damning for Mr. Roth as the bulk of these questionable moderation decisions were spearheaded by him. And as it turns out, he is kind of a weird guy…

Check out some of his tweets over the last decade:

At Twitter, it was long agreed by the vast majority of employees that Trump had to go. 

Despite the policy that Twitter would NOT ban any world leader, Yoel and his gaggle of technocrats did everything in their power to lobby the higher-ups within the company, and finally achieved their mission of creating a new set of rules on 1/7/2021.

Roth and his team were overjoyed, not only because the new “5-strike” policy was enacted according to their demands, but because under this new policy President Trump would already have four strikes and any further “misstep” (in their eyes) would allow them to delete his account forever.

Well sure enough, it was the very next day that this happened; Trump was permanently removed from Twitter’s site.

But once Twitter released the justification for this enforcement action, it was revealed that President Trump did not actually violate the site’s Terms of Service. In fact, it was Twitter’s interpretation of the broader “context” that allowed them to justify this perma-ban.

Here are Trumps tweets from Jan 8, shown NOT to be in violation of the ToS:

Internal communications from Vijaya Gadde (Yoel’s boss and confidant) prove Twitter used words like “American Patriot” to justify calling this incitement to violence:

This post is public so feel free to re-post or share with someone that will like it!

Why would Twitter employees act as political activists following one of the closest elections in American history?

As it turns out, former Twitter leadership was not only inherently biased, they were on a partisan-fueled power grab. Their team had documented plans to create a system of controlling all facets of every-day speech on the platform. The plan was to automate enforcement actions that would deliberately suppress or ban dissenting opinions, while bolstering the ideals of the party they happened to associate with, thereby steering the narrative in the direction of their choosing. This project was labeled “preposterous,”“insane,” and “impossible” by the lead reporter of the Twitter Files, Matt Taibbi:

It is important to note that Twitter and various Federal Agencies had a “revolving door” of employees.

Multiple FBI, CIA, and DHS agents left their posts as Feds to begin using their skill-sets at Twitter. There are currently more than 14 employees in critical moderation roles at Twitter (still today under Elon Musk) that were formerly Federal agents.

The 4th information drop from the Twitter Files revealed that Mr. Roth was having regular meetings with BOTH the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, dating back to when President Trump was in office.

This means we had the US Government’s intelligence community coordinating in “secret meetings” with the Twitter execs, deciding what news makes the cut, and more alarmingly, what doesn’t. Up until then, many on the Left were claiming the release of the Twitter Files have been a “nothing burger,” stating they simply show diligent employees at a private company moderating as they see fit to run the platform. Now that we know the US Government is involved in those decisions, there are extremely serious First Amendment implications. Twitter and the Federal Government over extended their power and trampled over America’s freedom of speech.

Now you probably realize why former Attorney General Bill Barr is the leading image of this week’s newsletter… 

As Attorney General, Barr was the “Top Cop” within our Federal Government, and it is clear that he was aware, if not orchestrating, these ongoing interactions between various law enforcement agencies and the moderation team at Twitter. The Twitter Files prove how casual and cavalier these individuals were, as they colluded to influence not only elections but public discourse.

In addition to their coordinated attempt to control speech, it has been confirmed that the FBI and Bill Barr were aware (and in physical possession of) the data contained on Hunter Biden’s laptop. The data was sent directly to Barr from Rudy Giuliani, and the FBI has since revealed an investigation was ongoing since at least 2019. Why Giuliani chose not to release the Laptop story himself in 2019 is still unknown.

Because the FBI never shared any of the damning information with the public, they subsequently chose not refute the letter sent out and signed by 51 former intelligence agents stating the laptop was “Russian Disinformation.” (Remember that it took more than 2 years for the Mainstream Media to verify the legitimacy of Hunter’s laptop, despite it already having been verified by the time the NY Post ran the article in 2020). The GOP House members stepping into a majority in January have promised investigation into these 51 “experts” as well as the overall collusion that happened; not only at Twitter, but all the Big Tech gatekeepers.

Following the 2020 election, you may recall Barr was tasked by President Trump to take a deep dive into the election irregularities that presented themselves.

However, to the contrary, Barr became one of the most outspoken critics of any and all questions surrounding the election. Beyond this, he went on multiple media tours in the past 2 years denouncing his previous boss, Trump, and writing off any election claims that may still have been worthy of investigation, labeling them as baseless. Meanwhile he was well aware of the laptop, what it contained, the FBI’s coordination with Twitter, and the subsequent decision to mislabel and suppress this story…

Note the date (10/19/2020) on this letter sent to Barr asking him to act, seemingly unaware he already knew all about the topic:

• Why were Barr and the FBI actively suppressing information on the Hunter Biden laptop story in the weeks leading up to the 2020 Election?

• Why was Barr allowing the FBI and related agencies to coordinate secretly with the enforcement teams at Twitter, undermining the President of his very own party?

• Does this raise to the level of interference in the 2020 General Election?

• Is this in direct violation of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution?

Unfortunately, although I believe this DOES amount to election interference and a Constitutional violation, it is my belief that the 2020 election is too far gone and will not be overturned. Perhaps there will be prosecutions, but I am not holding my breath.

However, the information presented unequivocally proves Bill Barr is compromised, so be sure to keep his nefarious actions in mind when he launches an inevitable 2024 Republican presidential campaign.

The revelations also make it crystal clear how important it will be to secure our future elections, including the recent 2022 Midterms, while insulating the public from the whims of Federal Agents and a Big Tech oligarch.

I am still hopeful that Kari Lake’s lawsuit in Arizona, detailing the multiple issues with the 2022 Midterms in her state, will be heard by a Judge. I plan on covering her case in detail next week as the hearing is slated to commence on the 21st.

If you want to learn more about Kari Lake’s lawsuit, click here:

Regarding the 2020 Election, there is one lawsuit of note that questions the veracity of the 2020 election. I will cover in more detail at the start of the new year…

If you want a head start, here is some information on Raland J. Brunson’s lawsuit, which has reached the Supreme Court docket and is due for a response from SCOTUS no later than January 6, 2023:

PLEASE LIKE, COMMENT, AND SHARE!